tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8237917339730792916.post754466281961798103..comments2023-11-18T11:20:35.439-05:00Comments on Johnny Pez: Sobel Wiki: government in a minor keyJohnny Pezhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07430884010621619176noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8237917339730792916.post-87651594573201576042016-10-09T07:04:57.159-04:002016-10-09T07:04:57.159-04:00Did you know that you can earn cash by locking pre...Did you know that you can earn <b>cash</b> by locking <b>premium pages</b> of your blog / website?<br />Simply open an account on <b><a href="http://syntaxlinks.com/affiliate-network-reviews/network/14/AdscendMedia/" rel="nofollow">AdscendMedia</a></b> and <b>implement their Content Locking tool</b>.Bloggerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07287821785570247118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8237917339730792916.post-26263291154354165092013-02-09T09:44:13.006-05:002013-02-09T09:44:13.006-05:00I think Sobel has another failure of parliamentary...I think Sobel has another failure of parliamentary imagination in the 1963 elections. In 1958 Mason wins very narrowly and the electorate is described as bitterly divided but not on sectional lines. Then there is a split in the Liberal Party, with Mason getting a divided convention endorsement but purging the party of malcontents and running his own third-party candidates in several districts. The obvious IOW analogue is the Democrats in 1972 (after Sobel wrote the book), who got utterly hammered. Mason should have had trouble getting pluralities in very many seats at all, but Sobel has him losing only 80-70...DaveMBhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00779581893863396042noreply@blogger.com